Abstract

The article examines the questions that the Supreme Court of Cassation should answer in its interpretative case № 3/2022. The case was started by the General Assembly of the Civil and Commercial Collegiums of the court, in connection with controversially resolved disputes by the Bulgarian courts, in cases of an illegal use of an object of copyright, the holder of which is a person with a habitual residence outside the territory of Bulgaria. The article examines the questions in depth and based on the analysis, pro-vides suggestions for an answer.